Thanks,
Excuse for my ignorance, 2 last questions:
- In the JPOX case it means using JPOX instead of OJB, right?
- "Apache licensed JDO 2.0 implementation is scheduled for OJB 2.0". Is
there info somewhere about the schedule? (In that case i would wait, i'm
not in production yet)
Regards,
Phil
Martin Kal�n wrote:
Philippe Guillard wrote:
Then i red somthing i should read before in FAQ section 3.3 "I
recommend to not use JDO now, but to use the existing ODMG api for
the time being" and wonder if this would affect my problem too...
Any suggestion / what i should do next?
If you have any doubts about the status/completeness of the different
APIs included in Apache OJB, you can always check the following page:
http://db.apache.org/ojb/status.html
If you want to use something production-ready, the choice between ODMG
and JDO is easy: ODMG.
If you explicitly want to use the JDO standard and don't mind the current
plug-in soloution and beta status in OJB you can still stick with OJB
JDO.
If you are searching for a production-ready JDO 1 implementation right
now, you are better off with JPOX:
http://www.jpox.org/
Regards,
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
