Let me expand my idea (sorry if I get boring).
I have a User object. Each user has a LoginHour list. So, using JDK 5.0
could I declare
public class User {
private String username;
private String password;
private List<LoginHour> loginHours;
public void setUsername(String newUsername) {...}
public String getUsername() {...}
public void setPassword(String newPassword) {...}
public Stirng getPassword() {...}
public void setLoginHours(List<LoginHour> loginHours) {
this.loginHours = loginHours;
}
public List<LoginHour> getLoginHours() {
return this.loginHours;
}
}
And this will work fine? There is nothing to be changed on
class-descriptor, neihter in collection-descriptor?
TIA,
Edson Richter
Thomas Dudziak escreveu:
On 8/8/05, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone has an example about how could OJB be used with Generics? This
will not affect the class-mapping descriptor?
Since Java generics will be compiled to non-generic bytecode, it does
not really affect classloading etc. Hence it should not matter when
running OJB, you simply specify the collection-descriptor etc. as you
would for non-generic code. The only differences are that OJB does not
(yet) support enums, and that the XDoclet module might not work with
generic code (you'll at least need a CVS build of the XDoclet code to
be able to parse 1.5 code).
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
MGR Informática Ltda.
Fones: 3347-0446 / 9259-2993
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
