>
> I think OTM is kind of "deprecated", but i don't know if it's important
> for
> this issue.
> In my mind when you do a commit a transaction, if something fails, no step
> of the transaction should have been commited, so maybe your database
> do not support transactions.
>
>
I also wonder what the OTM story is. Is it because of the dirty reads?  Does
the 2nd level cache make the OTM obsolete?

Reply via email to