Hello,
I looked more precisely at my issue regarding foreign keys not being set, so
now i'am using official OJB 1.0.4.
The exact issue is that when i persist a new object (that has not been
persisted before), the linked object is persisted and the foreign key is
set. But when i retrieve an object, then sets the linked object and then
persists the main object this time the linked object is not persisted and
the foreign key not set.
I'am using the following code, to do the persistence, so the linked object
is set before that code :
Implementation impl = OJB.getInstance();
TransactionExt tx = (TransactionExt) impl.newTransaction();
tx.begin();
tx.markDirty(product);
tx.commit();
Can that be the reason ? Is the way OJB is navigating the object graph
different for an
initial store or an update ?
If you want i can try to package up a simple test case from that.
Thank you for your help.
Jean-Yves
2006/2/20, Jean-Yves Sironneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello, I have a few unrelated questions regarding OJB :
>
> - Is there a way to set the deferrable foreign key constraint setting
> using OJB xdoclet module ?
>
> - When i use anonymous foreign key in a relationship, it's working
> perfectly for collections, but
> for simple reference to an object, i have to store the referenced object
> and then store the object referencing
> it, otherwise the two objects are created in db but the foreign key id is
> not set.
>
> It's pretty hard to discover it because, when i retrieve the objects they
> are ok even if the db foreign key is not set. It's
> just later, if i restart my application for example, that the referenced
> objects fields are null.
>
> So i have two questions : Do you think it's normal behaviour ? And how can
> i force OJB to retrieve everything
> from database to be able to test this kind of possible issues ?
>
> By the way i'am using CVS version of OJB 1.1 approximately 2-3 months ago
> and the ODMG API
> (which is really working fine except for that).
>
> - Is the code for OJB 1.1 located in the 1.0 SVN branch ? Because i don't
> know if i better use
> OJB 1.0.4 (or future 1.0.5) or the version i got from CVS.
>
>
> Thanks your for your help.
>
> Jean-Yves
>
>
