Having read that thread, I think I understand. But it's still kind of disappointing. In the example I gave before, I don't want my client of Customer to have to deal with different objects for different states. To him, it should all be Customer objects.
I think I'm still searching for the Holy Grail, where persistance is a necessary evil as a result of hardware limitations, and the core part of the system should haven't to be aware of it. David Thomas Mahler wrote: > This is typically addressed by report queries. (check mail archive for > recent postings on this subject). > > > > David Corbin wrote: > >> Is it possible to have a proxy object that has some of the object >> data, but not all of it? For example, I might want to list a bunch >> of Customers, which means I want to show their name, but only have >> the actual object loaded when the user clicks on the link for a >> specific customer. >> >> >> Thanks. >> David >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
