Hi,

I'm using HSQLDB and I have the same problems. It's for sure a bug in 
OJB. I'm considering not to use n:m relations anymore, maybe I can avoid 
n:m and redesign my database model. But for me it's also strange that 
such an important feature is buggy.

I had also other problems but that might be because of my faulty 
configuration. I used  in the connection-descriptor in repository.xml 
jdbc-level="1.0" to be on the safe side, but since I'm using 
jdbc-level="2.0" some problems were gone.

I think I'll stay with ODMG because I don't think that this bug is in 
the persistence layer and not in the ODMG API layer - in other words: I 
think it wouldn't help to migrate to PersistenceBroker API.

I'll keep on experimenting and I'll keep you updated.

/olaf

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Hi,
>Thank you for writing.
>
>Is this a problem with ODMG and Oracle or is it independent
> of the DataBase?
>Because it is a very important feature and it's strange to
> have a bug like this.
>
>Did you find many bugs in ODMG or only this? I am deciding
> wich way I'm going to take with the project yet...
>
>Thanks.
>  
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to