well, if I have the primary key fields in the table remain the same, I can modify the object without getting an concurrentmodification exception, that a feature? :) --- Jason McKerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, good point. Hadn't quite thought that one > through. Don't really > know what to say about that one. Someone else, I > think, will have to > address that. > > -Jason > > > On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 13:17, Cornelius Keller wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > > > I ve read the Javadoc you posted well. > > > > > > Jason McKerr wrote: > > > This likely is not an OJB issue. Either that or > somewhere OJB is > > > iterating over and modifying a collection at the > same time. The tw > > > should be split to prevent this from happening. > > > > In my opinion exactly this could happen in the > singlevm > > PersitenceBrokerImpl if you have more then one > Instance of it in the > > same JVM. It iterates over Collections coming out > of the metadata Layer > > wich is accessable form every PB instance and due > to this not thread-safe. > > > > My Patch solved that Problem for me, I am not > shure if it will do for > > the Originator of this Thread, cause as I read now > in his stacktrace he > > used the ODMG api. But I posted it in case it is > usefull. > > > > > > > Here's the javadoc for this issue. > > > > > > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/util/ConcurrentModificationException.html > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
