Hi, I encountered the null reference problem like described in http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1126.
By reading these messages archive, I see two solutions to solve this problem : 1. use wrappers (see http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1612 ). Some people are saying that Long is a solution http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1614 and http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1616, other ones are saying BigDecimal's need to be used. 2. modify the code ( see http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=466546) to take null's into account. I have three questions : a. WHICH wrapper is going to work : Integer, Long, BigDecimal and/or an other one ? b. what are the advantages, disadvantages of both solutions ? c. shall a new release of OJB contain support for null in Integer's or int's ? Thanks for helping me to solve this dilemma.
