Hi Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > How long are OJB from have a thread-safe cache strategy ?
Not far away. The OTM refactoring is making a lot of progress. > e.g. Have physical or logical have one cache per PersistenceBroker instead > of the global one ? For the time being you can use the EmptyCacheImpl to avoid clashes. cheers, Thomas > > /max > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frank Renaers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'OJB Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:08 AM > Subject: RE: OJB, Hibernate or Castor > > > >>Hi, >> >>Correction : OJB supports also 'long transactions'. >>In jakarta OJB, it's called 'optimistic locking'. >>It's possible to lock on a timestamp or a (version) number. >> >>Greetings, >> >>Frank >> >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Ampie Barnard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: vrijdag 4 oktober 2002 20:42 >>To: OJB Users List >>Subject: RE: OJB, Hibernate or Castor >> >> >>Thanks for your answer, Ted. Exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping > > for. > >>Has anyone had a similar experience with Hibernate and then decided to use >>OJB? >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Ted Stockwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: 03 October 2002 04:38 >>To: OJB Users List >>Subject: Re: OJB, Hibernate or Castor >> >> >> >>--- Ampie Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>I am a little confused now. Which one should I use? >>> >> >>You're not going to get any answer but OJB here :-) but I thought I'd >>share my reasons for using OJB. I used Castor in a project of mine for >>more than a year, from version 8.something to 9.something. During that >>time I ran into a LOT of bugs. In fact, each release seemed to >>introduce more bugs. I fixed a couple of bugs myself and posted >>patches to thier list but I never saw the patches applied. >> >>What initially attracted me to OJB was that I saw that the project had >>produced a suite of regression tests. I hoped that OJB would be more >>bug free and stable than Castor and I have not been disappointed. OJB >>works as advertised. I have used OJB since version 0.7.343 and I have >>encountered only minor problems. (The major changes to the >>configuration file format in version 0.9.something wasn't a lot of fun >>though :-)). >> >>I also was attracted to the proxy support and support for 'extents' in >>OJB, which Castor didn't have last time I used it. Things I used in >>Castor that OJB doesn't have yet ...support for 'long transactions'. >> >>BTW, thanks very much to Mr. Mahler and the OJB team for sharing thier >>very fine work with us. >> >>ted stockwell >>jlense.sf.net >> >> >> >>__________________________________________________ >>Do you Yahoo!? >>New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! >>http://sbc.yahoo.com >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
