Hi, For the time being I implemented an EMptyCache that avoids possible clashes as a workaround. The *real* solution is still in the works in the OTM refactoring. But its progressing fast...
cheers, Thomas Ampie Barnard wrote: > Hi all > > What is the status of the problem described as: > " Issue #2: If you share persistent objects between threads (e.g., via > OJB's > caching or otherwise), then threads may read/write against > invalid > data if a transaction is aborted. An example of this is shown > at: > > http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listId=107&msgNo=2434 > " > Regards > > Ampie > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
