Now after digging for documentation I managed to get a m:n working pretty
easily with the intermediate table in a schema. But I am confused about a
1:n mapping working with just two tables that both have compound keys.  For
example I have:


   <class-descriptor
          class="com.MyTable1Class"
          table="Table1"
   >
  
       <field-descriptor id="1"
         name="field1"
         column="field1"
         jdbc-type="INTEGER"
         primarykey="true"
         autoincrement="false"
      />
      <field-descriptor id="2"
         name="field2"
         column="field2"
         jdbc-type="INTEGER"
         primarykey="true"
         autoincrement="false"
      />
      <field-descriptor id="3"
         name="field3"
         column="field3"
         jdbc-type="VARCHAR"
      />
     <collection-descriptor
         name="collectionOfStuffFromTable2"
         element-class-ref="com.MyTable2Class"
         auto-retrieve="true"
         auto-update="true"
         auto-delete="true"
      >
                        <inverse-foreignkey field-id-ref="1"/>
                        <inverse-foreignkey field-id-ref="2"/>
      </collection-descriptor>
</class-descriptor>

   <class-descriptor
          class="com.MyTable2Class"
          table="Table2"
   >
  
       <field-descriptor id="1"
         name="anotherfield1"
         column="anotherfield1"
         jdbc-type="INTEGER"
         primarykey="true"
         autoincrement="false"
      />
      <field-descriptor id="2"
         name="anotherfield2"
         column="anotherfield2"
         jdbc-type="INTEGER"
         primarykey="true"
         autoincrement="false"
      />
      <field-descriptor id="3"
         name="anotherfield3"
         column="anotherfield3"
         jdbc-type="VARCHAR"
         primarykey="true"
         autoincrement="false"
      />

</class-descriptor>

My understanding of the documentation in the dtd is that the
inverse-foreignkey elements refer to the field id in Table 2 but I am
confused as to how OJB knows that field1 in Table1Class maps to the column
specified by field-id-ref="1"??  Does it have to do with the order in which
the primary keys specified in the Table1Class descriptor?

Incidentally, I think I have it working, I am just curious about how it
knows to map field1 to anotherfield1 and field2 to anotherfield2.

Long mail for probably a simple question.

Thanks

Tim




<font face="Times New Roman" size="3">
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive 
any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or 
the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If 
you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) 
immediately.</p>
<p> Ce courriel est confidentiel et prot�g�. L'exp�diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et 
obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou 
des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) 
d�sign�(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser 
imm�diatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen.</p>
<p>====================================================</p>
</font>

Reply via email to