That's the problem alright. Souldn't PersistentFieldDefaultImpl be the default in the OJB.properties files that ship with OJB? I didn't change this in my OJB.properties, it was just set wrong in the distribution...
Anyway, thanks for the pointer! L. On 10/17/02 7:46 PM, "Gallagher, Ron (GEPS Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Laurie -- > > Make sure the PersistentFieldClass entry in your ojb.properties file points > to org.apache.ojb.broker.metadata.PersistentFieldDefaultImpl. It sounds > like you're using > org.apache.ojb.broker.metadata.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl. > > HTH > > Ron Gallagher > Atlanta, GA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Laurie Harper [mailto:zodiac@;holoweb.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:44 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: Private vs. public properties for persistent objects > > > This is probably just something obvious I've missed, but I'm having a > problem with OJB not recognising private properties. I've had to make all my > accessors/mutators public and add public implementations for those that > didn't exist, which somewhat cripples encapsulation in my object model :( > > Unless I'm mis-understanding something, I should be able to use private > fields with no accessors/mutators for DB specific properties like foreign > key IDs and, by extension, shouldn�t need to provide a public getter and > setter for other properties either. > > What do I need to do to get this to work? > > Thanks, > > L. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
