Thomas, Would it be valid to assume that the most mature mechanism of the three access mechanisms is the PersistenceBroker? In other words, if I were looking for the most stable of the three options, would I choose to code to the PersistenceBroker?
Tim On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Thomas Mahler wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Brian McCallister wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > Am investigating using JDO for persistance in a fairly major application > > and am A) partial to Jakarta, and B) partial to open source in > > general... so, am looking to figure out the current state of OJB's JDO > > implementation (and probably offer my help if it may be needed in > > bringing it up to deployability is feasible in near future). > > All help is welcome! > > > > > The FAQ suggests not using it right now, does that still hold? > > Yes! > > > If so, > > why not, > > We are behind schedule. Ok we have no real schedule, but I admit we are > really behind a bit. > The maintainance work on the OJB core parts takes much time. More than I > ever estimated. > > > and what is the state of the implementation? > > We have started the work on an abstraction layer OTM, that is intended > as the core of our ODMG and JDO personalities. > Thus there is currently no visible progress. > > cheers, > Thomas > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- ---------------------- Tim O'Brien Evanston, IL (847) 863-7045 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
