Thanks Jakob, I mapped it as 'Integer' and not 'int' and it is working now.
The issue, which is still not working, is that when I load object using broker.getCollectionByQuery(...) and then I set the associated object (in your case partner), then the association to partner is not stored to database correctly. If I loaded the object using broker.getObjectByIdentity method, it is working. Don't you know how to solve this? Thanks a lot. -----Puvodní zpráva----- Od: Jakob Braeuchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Odesláno: 22. novembra 2002 2:08 Komu: OJB Users List Predmet: Re: 0..1 associations & dynamic proxies hi peter, yes i have a simple testcase : person having a partner both of class Person implementing IPerson public class Person implements IPerson { ... private Integer idPartner; private IPerson partner; ... } public interface IPerson { ... public IPerson getPartner(); ... } if a person has no partner there is no prxy for it, getPartner() returns null. the repository is straight forward: .... /> <field-descriptor id="9" name="idPartner" column="idPartner" jdbc-type="INTEGER" /> <reference-descriptor name="partner" class-ref="brj.ojb.Person" proxy="true" > <foreignkey field-id-ref="9"/> </reference-descriptor> ... hth jakob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Rajsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:06 PM Subject: 0..1 associations & dynamic proxies > hello, > does anybody have 1 to 0..1 associations and uses > dynamic proxies? what is your experience with it? > how do you deal with dynamic proxies when the real > object is null? > > thanks, pr > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
