Hi again! Phase Web and Multimedia wrote:
Greetings,I have been using OJB for some time with the singlevm implementation of the PB. I have several webapps that are running in a virtual hosting environment each app is running in its own vm. I am using Tomcat 4.0.4 and have OJB instances running in a single context in each host. So each exists within its own classpath and do not overlap. My question however is that I have recently attempted to upgrade to 9.0.7 and the upgrade produced exceptions I was wondering if I am using the right PB for the job. It has worked under sizeable loads with no problem. But, if I should be running something more efficient then it would be all the better. Any information will be appreciated. Here is the config in my OJB.properties: #--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- # PersistenceBrokerFactory / PersistenceBroker #--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- PersistenceBrokerFactoryClass=org.apache.ojb.broker.ta.PersistenceBrokerFact oryDefaultImpl PersistenceBrokerClass=org.apache.ojb.broker.singlevm.PersistenceBrokerImpl
YOur configuration seems to be 100% OK!
Mh, I don't know if this feature works for ReportQueries too. Please try a "normal" query that fills a collection.I have also recently attempted to use the ReportQueryByCriteria.setStartAtIndex(int x) and ReportQueryByCriteria.setEndAtIndex(int x) in concert with a broker.getReportQueryIteratorByQuery(query). The results are not reduced. But rather the whole result is returned. Is this a bug or intentional?
cheers,
Thomas
Thanks, Brandon Goodin Phase Web and Multimedia P (406) 862-2245 F (406) 862-0354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phase.ws -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
