Hello Thomas,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Mahler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > I would like to repeat a question that had been asked by
> > Kevin Viet (20 Dec 2002)
> > Suppose I do the following in ODMG:
> >
> > txn.begin();
> > txn.lock(x); // or retrieve x by query, does not matter.
> > txn.commit()
> >
> > txn.begin()
> > y = ... // retrieve the same object as above by a suitable query
> > assertTrue(x == y); // fails
> > txn.commit();
>
> This is a known issue (see bug database)
oh, sorry.
I've seen that you fixed it on Friday. Thank you.
I will try it. But I really wonder how you wish
to change the behaviour without a change in the API.
Without a concept such as the javax.jdo.PersistenceManager,
there is no way to determine which transactions should
share a common scope of persistent objects and which shall
not. If *all* transaction (also parallel ones) share one
scope, this means a significant difference in behaviour.
Regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
