Hello,
sorry to bother you again, but I still got
no reply to my question, so I would like
to ask it again.
In short: Is is intended that a null-reference
is wrapped by a proxy?
It is unconvenient for several reasons. It
particular, proxies are not as transparent
as they could be.
Thank you for your help,
Olli
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Null references and proxies
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have observed the following behaviour in OJB 0.9.9 and just
> wanted to verify that it is intended this way.
>
> I have classes A and B, and A references B. (The primary key
> of B is of type
> long, which is mapped to jdbc type NUMERIC.)
>
> When I retrieve an A instance from the database and the
> respective foreign key column has as 0 in it,
> the B reference is null. So far, everything is great.
>
> But when I configure class B (or, alternatively the
> B-reference inside A)
> as dyamic proxy, the reference is not null, but rather a
> dynamic proxy that references a null.
>
> Is that intended? It is a bit unconvenient.
>
> Oliver
>
> --
> Dr. Oliver Matz
> ppi Media GmbH
> Deliusstraße 10
> D-24114 Kiel
> phone +49 (0) 43 1-53 53-422
> fax +49 (0) 43 1-53 53-2 22
> email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web www.ppi.de
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
