Peter Todos são bem vindos aos community groups do W3C! Seria muito bom se você entrasse :-) E quem mais se animar por aqui.
Se preferir, quando se apresentar, pode falar que é voluntário na OKBr e que foi indicado por mim para entrar no grupo. Ou podemos entrar juntos no Grupo. Eu não faço parte ainda, mas é até bom que eu participe porque sou chair do WG de Data on the Web, então, faz sentido. Me adiciona ai nos talks da vida, [email protected], e bora trocar uma idéia mais tarde, podemos coordenar pra trabalhar juntos pelo WG. Que tal? Na escuta, yaso ∞ w3c.br <http://w3c.br> ∞ ingraxa.eu On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Peter Krauss <[email protected]> wrote: > Prezados, > > Não é para já, mas vai ser relevante: algumas formas de participação > exigem "se expor em nome da OKBr"... Precisa ser "alguém de confiança da > OKBr", que ainda não é meu caso, pois confiança se conquista com calma... > por isso digo "vai ser relevante"... Quando? Condições? Vale para todos os > membros? (precisa pagar anualidade?) Coloco para o grupo. > > Tenho dois problemas: > > 1. Não sou ninguém perante o W3C, seria "mais reputado" se usasse a grife > OKBr através de uma caixa postal @OKBr-qualquer. Posteriormente, se > sucesso, poderíamos candidatar a própria OKBr como entidade-membro do > *Schema.org > Community Group.* > > 2. Tenho participado nas horas vagas, e senti que dá trabalho (!) > sobretudo para não "queimar o filme": meu inglês é ruim, preciso de > apoiadores me monitorando/corrigindo de vez em quando... Exemplos: > schemaorg/issues/405 <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/405>, > schemaorg/issues/280 > <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/280#issuecomment-75565671> > , schemaorg/issues/401 > <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/401>. Alias, quem quiser > ajudar por favor contribua com WikidataIDs na planilha da issue 280 (!). > > *Abaixo a situação oficial*: aos poucos o SchemaOrg está reduzindo o grau > de comprometimento com os *sponsors* <http://schema.org/docs/terms.html> > (Google, > Yahoo, Bing e cia) e assumindo maior compromisso (democrático!) com a > comunidade e o W3C... > Ontem, 31/3, foi oficialmente criada a *Schema.org Community Group* > dentro do W3C (!)... > Ainda é bastante e assumidamente informal > <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/403>, como Abdo e Oda > gostam ;-) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Dan Brickley <[email protected]> > Date: 2015-04-01 6:56 GMT-03:00 > Subject: Re: Proposed W3C Community Group for Schema.org > To: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <[email protected]> > Cc: Ralph Swick <[email protected]> > > > Update: the group has been approved and created: > https://www.w3.org/community/schemaorg/ > > Do please join up if you're interested in the finer detail of > schema.org collaboration. We'll continue to to make heavy use of > Github for issue tracking (i.e. > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues ) and will also keep > public-vocabs in-the-loop, but once the new extensions model is > implemented (next week or so) I suggest using the Community Group as > the default schema.org mailing list rather than public-vocabs. > > As a reminder the next release of schema.org is codenamed sdo-gozer, > and the list of issues (63 open) currently tagged against it is at > > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22sdo-gozer+release%22 > > We'll probably push a few of those open issues off into a subsequent > release so if you've opinions on the urgency or best resolution for > any of the issues listed, do jump in right away via Github. > > cheers, > > Dan > > On 31 March 2015 at 19:00, Dan Brickley <[email protected]> wrote: > > A quick note about a proposed Community Group for Schema.org at W3C, > > and its relationship with this list. > > > > The public-vocabs list is nearly 4(!) years old already. Since late > > 2011 it has been framed as the mailing list for W3C's "Web Schemas" > > task force of the Semantic Web Interest Group (charter at > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/webschema.html). > > > > During these last years those of us in the schema.org project have > > used the Web Schemas group and the [email protected] list as the > > primary list for day-to-day schema.org discussions. We have > > experimented with various collaboration mechanisms during that time, > > most recently by moving to an opensource codebase and extensive use of > > Github [1]. As we prepare to launch the recently announced extensions > > mechanism [2] we have realised that there is a need for a more > > dedicated Schema.org-specific forum that can be used to coordinate and > > discuss schema.org extensions. > > > > Therefore I have just filed a proposal for a new W3C "Schema.org > > Community Group", described as follows: > > > > "The Schema.org Community Group provides a forum for discussing all > > changes, additions and extensions to schema.org. In addition to > > providing a public setting for the day to day operation of the > > project, it serves as the mechanism for reviewing extensions and as a > > liaison point for all parties developing independent extensions to the > > schema.org core." > > > > There is naturally some overlap with this broader public-vocabs group, > > but the idea is that we will migrate all the more intense and detailed > > schema.org collaboration discussions into the new Community Group > > (while continuing to rely on Github to bring structure to our > > discussions and sanity to our inboxes). > > > > I hope many of the regular contributors to public-vocabs discussions > > will join and continue in the CG, and that public-vocabs will continue > > in the role initially outlined, i.e. as a high level meeting place for > > all efforts to bring structured data schemas into the Web. > > > > It looks like we only need one more person to vote for the group (we > > have 4/5 already) before it will be brought into existence. Which > > reminds me to emphasise that W3C Community Groups in general provide a > > great mechanism for topical schema discussions, whether schema.org > > oriented (like BibExtend, [4]) or otherwise. I'll keep this list > > updated as things get set up... > > > > cheers, > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues > > [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015Mar/0117.html > > [3] > https://www.w3.org/community/blog/2015/03/31/proposed-group-schema-org-community-group/#comment-55733 > > https://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/#schemaorg > > [4] https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-br mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br > >
_______________________________________________ okfn-br mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br
