Caros, ontem quando cheguei em casa à noite o Carlos já havia feito o serviço. Achei que ficou bom! Abraços, Bruno
2015-09-30 8:32 GMT-03:00 Everton Zanella Alvarenga <[email protected]>: > Revisei agora cedo a maior parte das contribuições do Carlos (obrigado!) > aqui nesse gdocs > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i7szBGL8fWZikmwemuA96bsEzlb0xEPZ4YqRY6yRxmA/[email protected]&ts=560abca4>. > Transcrevo abaixo como ficou. Contribuições aqui ou no gdcos bem-vindas. > > > *Watch out! The Brazilian Congress is trying to butcher the Brazilian > Civil Rights Framework for the Internet!* > *Civil society organizations gathered in the coalition pro Internet Rights > law ('Articulação Marco Civil Já!') already repudiate parliamentary > initiatives that threaten the internet users privacy and freedom of > expression.* > > > *There are currently bills in the House of Representatives that threaten > one of the most important democratic gains of the last period - the > approval of the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet (“Marco > Civil da Internet” - MCI), Law 12.965/2014. The MCI ensures fundamental > rights to network users, such as privacy and freedom of expression in line > with internationally accepted guidelines of Internet governance.* > Encouraged by private sectors of great economic power and their > self-interest to restrain criticism of movements backed by the right to > freedom of expression, parliamentarians presented bills in the House that > change the MCI. > > PL 215/2015 - a bill presented by Brazilian representative Hildo Rocha > (PMDB), and its attachments - PL 1547/2015 authored by Expedito Netto, and > PL 1589/2015 by Soraya Santos - seeks to include harsher punishments into > articles 48 and 141 of Brazil's Criminal Code to inhibit social network > users crimes. Furthermore, the bill changes provisions of MCI, modifying > articles 10, 13, 15, 19 and adding article 21-A. These changes grant public > authorities access to data from Internet users with no need of a court > order, and mandatory removal of published online content after a simple > allegation of crime against honor, which also impose individual and > economic restriction penalties to internet providers deeply compromising > the principles of non-accountability on the internet. User's data that > authorities will be able to obtain without a warrant include all online > communication - content from e-mails, online chat and conversations through > messenger apps such as Skype and Whatsapp. > > The bill 215/2015 puts at risk the necessary balance between protecting > the right to privacy and the criminal prosecution as well as democracy > itself by allowing such abuses. > > Such proposals have already been rejected in the course of MCI. > Incidentally, it is worth noting that the devices now present in the MCI > were the result of a broad social debate and an intense political > negotiation, which makes this one of the most democratic laws already voted > in the recent history of Brazil’s National Congress. > > We believe that any change in MCI should be preceded by a qualified > discussion, supported by technical considerations, political and social. It > is needed, mostly, intense democratic participation equivalent to the > process from which it originated, with a public consultation process, so > that society interests can be represented regarding personal data > protection and freedom of expression on the internet. > > We know that a very significant wing of the PMDB frontally opposed to the > approval of MCI, representing conservatory and powerful economic interests > agents. However, such interest can not override the safeguards established > by the democratic legislative process and the public interest as so overly > advocated in MCI's debate. > > The initiative of the mentioned representatives undermines the Rule of Law > principles, in that it reveals itself as retaliation for established > rights, even before the MCI being regulated, with the clear objective to > reverse the victory that Brazilian society had in Congress . > > Therefore, entities gathered in coalition pro Internet Rights Law > repudiate the artful maneuver and anti-democratic action carried forward by > the PMDB, which stimulates the arbitrary vigilantism and unreasonable > censorship, impairing the Rule of Law. We require that the representatives > wait for the democratic process already established by the Executive and > the bill of Personal Data Protection which will address the same issue, > however, with broad participation. > > Original a título de comparação: http://plespiao.org.br/ > > > 2015-09-29 21:15 GMT-03:00 Carlos Andrade <[email protected]>: > >> Eu tentei corrigir o máximo possível em todos os paragrafos, estão em >> modo revisão para vocês decidirem. Não conheço o vocabulário americano para >> política, então os nomes precisam ser verificados se significam mesmo as >> mesmas coisas para o pessoal aqui (EUA) e/ou outros lugares. Alguns >> cuidados a tomar é com a consistência dos nomes que não foi mantida pelo >> tradutor (e.g. Articulação Marco Civil Já logo no inicio e ao fim do texto). >> >> Um parágrafo completo estava faltando do PLEspião: >> >> Na sétima e última versão do substitutivo, a proposta ainda prevê a >> ampliação dos dados cadastrais a serem coletados pelos provedores de >> internet, impondo a obrigação de reterem dados como endereço completo, >> telefone e CPF, que poderão ser repassados, sem ordem judicial, para >> autoridades que tenham atribuição legal para fazer esse pedido. >> >> O qual me parece ser extremamente importante não estar faltando! >> >> Coloquei ele lá no documento como lembrete. Acho também que seria >> interessante colocar um link para as leis mencionadas. Por fim, eu não sei >> o que será feito do texto em inglês, mas se o objetivo for divulgação e/ou >> assinaturas como a versão em pt ou a página da OKFN-BR, sugiro reduzir o >> número de adjetivos do texto original criticando partidos. pessoas e >> filosofia de atentado a isso e aquilo ir direto ao ponto, que pelo se >> resume a o que é a Lei 12.965/2014 (MCI), a PL 215/2015, os artigos >> modificados e o que passaria a entrar em vigor (parágrafo acima e começando >> a falar sobre a PL 215/2015). Apesar de tanto paragrafo também não me ficou >> claro no documento a urgência dele e/ou links para acompanhamento do mesmo. >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Everton Zanella Alvarenga > Open Knowledge Brasil > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-br mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br > >
_______________________________________________ okfn-br mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br
