On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luis Villa wrote: >> Do we have anyone actually using the definition yet? I'm always >> reluctant to call things 1.0 until they've had significant amounts of >> rubber-meeting-road. >> > Using it for what? > > Also, I'd throw in my vote for "Open Network Service Definition" (ONSD), > which is close to OSDN but not confusingly so. However, it does use two > appositive nouns, which can be a little hairy (is it a definition for > open network services, or a service definition for open networks?).
I agree. Open Service is not very specific. I vote for "Open Network Service ... " or "Open Web Service ... ". > > -Evan > > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss > _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
