On 12 July 2010 06:40, Peter Murray-Rust <[email protected]> wrote: > So I currently suggest OKFTheses or OKTheses to avoid the name clash, but > that's just a start. >
Longer term, I think the name should be something that universities would want to boast about working with, so I'd avoid acronyms that people won't recognise. What about something along the lines of 'Shared Theses Project' or 'Free Theses Project'. In terms of priorities, from my own experience, getting a set of 'principles' across to universities is important part, rather than the technical matter of indexing metadata. This is the rather confused boilerplate text that my university currently uses (apologies to open-science listmembers who've already seen it): *This electronic thesis is protected by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. No reproduction is permitted without consent of the author. It is also protected by the Creative Commons Licence allowing Attributions-Non-commercial-No derivatives. * Thomas
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
