Also of possible interest, some slides I did on different review models: http://www.slideshare.net/ldodds/authoritative-whats-that-who-says
The fertile ground to explore is the separation between dissemination and certification. At the moment these are conflated (content not published until reviewed) but there are other approaches. L. On 7 September 2010 14:10, Daniel Mietchen <[email protected]> wrote: > Public peer review of the kind described there has already been in use > in some journals for years, and their experience suggests that it > increases the quality of both the sbumissions and the reviews, while > decreasing the load for reviewers and making their work visible (if > they choose not to remain anonymous). > > For a recent overview, see > http://www.slideshare.net/UlrichPoeschl/poschl-oaspa-prague2010up7 . > > Daniel > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: >> Copying this to new humanities working group! >> >> Could be worth getting in touch? >> >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Mr. Puneet Kishor <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> cnāwan vs. crūdan >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/arts/24peer.html?hp=&pagewanted=all >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Puneet Kishor http://punkish.org >>> Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org >>> Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org >>> Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor >>> Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science >>> ======================================================================= >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> okfn-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jonathan Gray >> >> Community Coordinator >> The Open Knowledge Foundation >> http://blog.okfn.org >> >> http://twitter.com/jwyg >> http://identi.ca/jwyg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> okfn-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss >> > > > > -- > http://www.google.com/profiles/daniel.mietchen > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > Find out more about Talis at http://www.talis.com/ > shared innovation™ > > Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those > of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email message > and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the > intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please > return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an > unauthorised recipient is prohibited. > > Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is > registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights Court, > Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB. > -- Leigh Dodds Programme Manager, Talis Platform Talis [email protected] http://www.talis.com _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
