On Apr 3, 2013 11:09 AM, "Mark Wainwright" <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the panel of 5 men is not a 1-in-32 freak occurrence, it appears > that such panels are not very 'open' to women - since I do not think > that women are constitutionally less interested in open data or less > competent to take part in panels.
Panels like this aren't chosen based on interest or competency. They are chosen based on credentials. You want people that sound interested and competent so they attract an audience, rather than just people that are interested and competent. You'll notice everyone on the panel is high up in some relevant organisation. If such people are disproportionately male, then it makes sense for the panel to be disproportionately male. The problem would seem to lie with the recruitment or promotion policies of those organisations (or perhaps is even further down the chain). Using positive discrimination to balance a panel is just treating the symptoms and won't achieve much.
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
