Obviously, the OKF is going to take the view that "Open" is term here. OKF even creates the Open Definition which is based on the Open Source definition from OSI.
I personally go with FLO to combine these terms. Both Free and Open are easy to be unclear what it really means, but in the context of the OKF, everyone is going to easily get that *they* mean Open per their own definition. -- Aaron Wolf wolftune.com On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Gene Shackman <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you want to sell this to the public, you need a better term than "free" > (and not "libre"). Because people will think free means free to use. "Free > and open" might do it. Most people probably have some vague idea what open > means. Or "free and open source". > > Gene > > > > ------------------------------ > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 10:28 AM PST William Waites wrote: > > > > >Free Software has a well accepted definition: > > > > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html > > > > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss > Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss >
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
