Il giorno ven, 17/12/2010 alle 22.29 +0100, Stefano Costa ha scritto: > > Mediawiki is far better when it comes to having a complex structure of > pages, it has a few extensions that will be very helpful for this > project (Extension:Cite being the first) and is generally easier for > newcomers, who may already know Wikipedia. That said, for > wiki.okfn.org > the difference is not going to be very significant. > > I cannot judge the sysadmin side of the story. MW is pretty much like > any other LAMP-based software.
We had a short call about this a few minutes ago (notes at http://okfnpad.org/open-methods ). Basically the request would be for: * http://methods.okfn.org/ subdomain for the time being (other domain names already taken) * installation of Semantic MediaWiki - I can take care of it myself, if given the right credentials and instructions on which server should be used (SMW is a MW extension, so PHP). PostgreSQL is almost untested as db backend of SMW unfortunately, so MySQL would be better. Any question is welcome! Open Methods aims at establishing a common (and possibly multilingual) repository of methods and workflows in any field of knowledge. Thank you steko -- Stefano Costa Coordinator, Working Group on Open Data in Archaeology http://wiki.okfn.org/wg/archaeology The Open Knowledge Foundation http://www.okfn.org ยท http://opendefinition.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ okfn-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-help
