On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:37 PM, William Waites <[email protected]> wrote: > * [2011-07-08 18:09:01 +0200] Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> écrit: > > ] I think the issue is that it costs us nothing to stay with things as > ] they are. It costs us - in your own estimation - two weeks of > ] someone's time to look into this, let along set something up. > > Given OKF's budget and turnover, a little bit of overhead for > investment in its own working infrastructure doesn't seem so > unreasonable.
Indeed. But depends how much. E.g. if we have to invest 2-3 days per month to maintain something which is flakier than other things which we can use for free then I'm not sure we can justify this - rather than, e.g. making our code better, or encouraging more people to open up more data. ;-) > ] If you have ideas about people we could contact who might be able to > ] help us sort this out that would be very greatly appreciated! > > You're usually pretty good at using the propaganda channels to > communicate about OKF... I've just sent a twitter message for you to > get started... I know how to use email and a web browser, but I can't magically find people! Nor do I know people who know about this sort of thing, other than you. You seem to know how this stuff works - and to know people who've done it before. Hence my asking. J. > Also if any of you see anarcat when he's in London, pick his brains > a bit on this. > > -w > -- > William Waites <mailto:[email protected]> > http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:[email protected]> > F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45 > -- Jonathan Gray Community Coordinator The Open Knowledge Foundation http://blog.okfn.org http://twitter.com/jwyg http://identi.ca/jwyg _______________________________________________ okfn-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-help
