> On the "Go"-menu, it should not say "Back/Forward in Document". It is > confusing because it depends on which direction you arrived at the > current page. > > Instead, it could say "Forward in page history" and "Backward in page > history". Or "Back" and "Next", as I have seen in web-browsers.
I agree there, the current oxygen icons aren't helping either, so distinguishing between "back one page" and "back in the browsing history" should be as concise as possible. However I have a feeling that the wording of "Forward in page history" and "Backward in page history" could be improved as the entries consist of too many elements that together may lead to confusion. In addition translations may get fairly long. What about "Step backward" and "Step forward" instead? > ------- Additional Comments From toscano.pino tiscali it 2008-02-06 16:37 > ------- > I'm not sure to agree, the "in Document" suffix was added to > distinguish those actions from the Konqueror actions. Otherwise, > you'd see two "Back/Forward" actions when using Okular embedded in > Konqueror, one of them for the Konqueror history, and the other one > for Okular. Maybe including menu entries from embedded kparts in Konqueror isn't such a good idea then. I am rather tired and frustrated that interaction design decisions regarding Okular as a document reader have to be plain bad because of possible issues with the kpart in Konqueror. This leads to some pretty bad wording in menu entries but also a poor choice of shortcuts. Florian _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
