2009/10/2 Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org>: > A Dissabte, 3 d'octubre de 2009, Benoit Jacob va escriure: >> Sigh. Am I really ridiculous, as you imply, for having expected a >> little "thanks" ? > > Sincerely, yes, saying thanks is a good manner that is being gradually lost > (at lest here in Barcelona), and that's bad. So i'm sorry to only find > problems in your contributions and not be positive about your findings.
:) When you submit a patch to a project and a core maintainer says thanks, that matters a lot :) >> I never said that. As soon as I read about your proposal to introduce >> the option, I was satisfied. It is useless for DVI, but it doesn't >> disturb me. And I understand that you want only one GUI for >> configuration, not one per file format. > > Exact, the option might be of not much use for DVI, but an option per format > sucks a lot Yes, agreed (see previous mail). > >> All is OK and for the rest, I >> was only replying point by point to your replies. >> >> Again, let's not end this discussion on bad feelings. I don't know how >> such a technical discussion about patches could lead to bad moods but >> let's make sure it's over now. I never meant to offend you or attack >> you personnally, I was only criticizing existing code. > > No problem, it sometimes gets too much personal when it shouldn't, i'm not > angry and you are not, everyone's happy :-) > >> Thanks for listening, > > Thanks for the patch, serious. You're welcome :) Benoit PS. Blogging about this didn't help either. I always knew that something was a bit dangerous about blogs, and I even mentioned it in the 1st sentence of my post, now I understand better. The lesson that I learned : only blog about a patch AFTER it has been accepted. _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
