El Dissabte, 19 d'octubre de 2013, a les 20:53:32, Bogdan Cristea va escriure: > On Sat 19 Oct 2013 07:04:25 PM CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dissabte, 19 d'octubre de 2013, a les 15:15:37, Luigi Toscano va escriure: > >> Bogdan Cristea wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> What is the status of porting okular to KF5 ? Given the current status > >>> of > >>> KF5 is this possible ? > >> > >> We are talking about a still unstable set of libraries (KF5) over a still > >> unstable set of libraries (Qt 5.2). If you check the expected timelines, > >> KDE Applications will still have new releases for the 4.x series (4.12 > >> will arrive soon, 4.13 is expected too, I wouldn't be surprised by > >> 4.14). Sure, experimental versions can be tried too, but as usual it's a > >> matter of manpower (which is lacking). Albert can say something more, as > >> I'm not a "core" developer, but *I* think that *right now* is better to > >> have a more complete and stable version for 4.x than to spend time > >> porting on two layers of instability. > > > > +1 > > > > Your time is better invested either in: > > A) Improving Okular as we shit it now > > B) Improving KF5 itself. > > I am interested in porting okular core library to embedded platforms > (e.g. Android). I would like to experiment with okular and KF5 since > KF5 uses now a modular structure, much more suitable I believe for > stand alone KDE applications.
So if you have an interest, what's stopping you doing it? :-) Cheers, Albert > > > _______________________________________________ > Okular-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
