aacid added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> aheinecke wrote in generator_pdf.cpp:475 > @aacid When you commited the corresponding poppler patch you did not add this > API. > > The problem here is: > > - In the LinkPrivate dtor we delete the nextLinks list. > - createLinkFromPopplerLink deletes the parsed the link. > > My solution for this was to add API to change the nextLinks so that they can > be "taken" from a Link. > > Maybe in poppler we could add "Poppler::Link::takeNextLinks()" to have a more > explicit API for that? > > Alternatively changing "createLinkFromPopplerLink" to optionally not delete > the link it parses? I think that is a bit more error prone as we have to make > sure we catch everything. For example the movie and rendition actions have > their own deletion. We have some takeXX functions but i personally don't like them much because they "break" the object, it may be very well possible that at some point we need to do getNextLinks somewhere else and we wouldn't see "we're doing it wrong" easily, since it would just be returning an empty list. I think adding a parameter to createLinkFromPoppler is the way to go, and yes it already is not great that createLinkFromPoppler behaves "randomly" in whether it should delete or not the links it gets. REPOSITORY R223 Okular REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D11609 To: aheinecke, #okular Cc: aacid, michaelweghorn, ngraham