Wow, I was really cranky there. Sorry about that :-( - Alan
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alan Millar <[email protected]> wrote: > Innacuracies? Snort. If we're talking about what we all know, we all > know that legal status doesn't determine what people do, how they act, > how they write, and how they wish to abscribe responsibility and > credit. People do things in groups, and the membership and > participation in the group can mutate over the duration of the work's > creation process. This is a regular human activity, regardless of how > the group is labelled by its members or others. Absurd legal fictions > like corporate personhood have little relevance to this common > process. > > Terms like "corporate body" may have a different definition or > connotation in the legal sphere than in the library science sphere. > It probably has other connotations in other contexts also. That > doesn't make it intrinsically wrong. It just means it needs > definition for the context. > > - Alan > _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
