I think we're in both territories. Empty works are probably the result of a process that has (had) errors in it. Or more processes. But the resulting edition-less works had better be merged (instead of deleted) to not lose information and create redirects for the hypothetical cases in which the work keys are in use.
Ben On 21 May 2012 03:54, Karen Coyle <[email protected]> wrote: > If you look at: > > http://openlibrary.org/search?q=isaac+asimov+mercurio > > You see that out of 8 "works", 7 have 0 editions. So I think we're in > bug territory, not de-duplication territory. > > kc > > > On 5/20/12 2:43 PM, Ben Companjen wrote: >> On 20 May 2012 23:21, Ben Companjen<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have one more list of duplicates, this time it's work records. >> >> You may want to see the source for the aggregations as well :) The >> data for the aggregation is at >> <http://companjen.name/ol/dupe_works_raw.csv>, GROUP BY'd and >> including title slug and subtitle slug. >> >> Ben >> _______________________________________________ >> Ol-tech mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to >> [email protected] >> > > -- > Karen Coyle > [email protected] http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
