On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Anand Chitipothu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17-Jan-2012, at 4:23 AM, Ben Companjen wrote: > > Are issues on Launchpad still being addressed / tracked? The RDF > tagged issues are all on Launchpad, but e.g. > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/openlibrary/+bug/588598> from June 2010, > which appears to be not an issue anymore, is still 'New'. Does it make > sense to try to (fix and) close issues on Launchpad? > > No, we stopped using launchpad. We only track the github issues right now. > > https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/issues >
I can't find any announcement of about the change or how the migration was done. Did the migration include: 0. All bugs 1. All open bugs 2. Only bugs that we triaged as being important enough to migrate 3. Some other set of bugs 4. No bugs It's tempting to start fresh, particularly if there's a backlog of stale bug reports which haven't been addressed in a while, but I'm not sure it sends the right message to the people who invested effort in reporting the bugs (or, more importantly, those considering future efforts in testing and bug reporting). Tom _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
