Thanks. That's good to know. In my experience, OL tends to be pretty reliable, so it sounds like we should report when that's not the case. (and happy you were able to parse around the missing "not" in that sentence.)
Tom On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Anand Chitipothu <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 22-Sep-2013, at 10:42 AM, Tom Morris wrote: > > > Thanks for the update, Anand. > > > > Can you clarify whether you've got an operational alarm system in place > for when errors (say 500s) exceed a certain threshold? I tend to bothering > reporting things that I think would covered by that, but if you don't have > such a facility available to you, I can report any time I notice things > going bad. > > We have alerts when various services fail to respond with expected status > code or fail to respond with in reasonable time. That usually catches most > of the errors. We don't have alerts for rate of errors. > > Anand > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
