If it's to benefit the users, why isn't it optional -- and announced on ol-discuss or someplace else public?
I applaud supporting HTTPS, but it should be optional. HTTPS defeats browser plugins and other useful stuff. Tom On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Anand Chitipothu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > As part of the efforts to improve the privacy of users, > openlibrary.orgwebsite is now only available via https. > > https://openlibrary.org/ > > All the existing links to http://openlibrary.org/ will be automatically > redirected to https://openlibrary.org/. > > The xxx.json URLs will continue to work with http:// to make sure the > existing API clients won't break. > > Please let me know if you notice any issues. > > Anand > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
