Here are some guidelines for versioning :
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-versioning
I know Akara likes to use dates for release names and the guidelines
above certainly don't preclude it. I checked the existing incubator
projects and they're all using the /major.minor.point/ system of versioning.
If we follow this convention, our first release will be 0.1.0. The
advantage to this is that if we make only minor changes and/or fix bugs
we can simply update the point (to 0.1.1). This naming gives the user
some idea of the level of changes that went in.
Does anyone else have a suggestion or opinion on the above ?
Shanti
William Sobel wrote:
A month sounds like it's doable, or should be! I think we already have
a planned release structure in the repo. Now for the toughest
question, how do we want to number the releases?
Cheers,
- Will Sobel
