Fabian Deutsch wrote: > Maybe a bit out of date? I mean, there has been a lot of movement since > 1999 ... especially in this (mesh) area ..
The paper is perfectly recent enough to illustrate that there are, obviously, more than 3 substantially different routing protocols available, which was the point I was making. I wouldn't call most any of the general-purpose mesh routing work that I've seen since that paper was published groundbreaking. A possible exception is Biswas' and Morris' opportunistic routing (ExOR), but I don't think that'll be of much good given our use case. -- Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D -- olpc-software mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/olpc-software
