Dan Williams wrote: > That's certainly debatable... FF has a lot of junk that we may/may not > need.
Right. Davidz mentioned on IRC that we're now getting Gecko out of XULRunner instead of Firefox, so I suppose there's no compelling reason to keep Firefox proper around. > This isn't to say the the Sugar bits will be the only way to look > at web pages, but you have to ask what all the stuff in FF is needed > for. I haven't looked at the very recent Sugar snapshots, but do we have it playing nicely with the canvas element and such? I seem to recall earlier versions couldn't show Logowiki. -- Ivan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D -- olpc-software mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/olpc-software
