I would assume they do wish to stand for re-election. The publicity on this has been terrible. I don't know who is in charge, but they should have made sure they sent several reminders of deadlines to file for candidacy. In fact, was there ever an announcement sent out to all of the membership asking if they wish to run and giving deadlines and a timeline? I didn't see even one. This has always been done in the past. It looks like someone is trying to rig the election! (Sorry... but that is how some of us from the US feel about elections right now!)
Caryl ________________________________ From: IAEP <[email protected]> on behalf of Laura Vargas <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 8:44:55 AM To: Dave Crossland Cc: iaep; Sugar-dev Devel; OLPC para usuarios, docentes, voluntarios y administradores; SLOBs Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder 2016-12-02 11:38 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: On 2 December 2016 at 11:28, Laura Vargas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: 2016-12-02 11:27 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: On 2 December 2016 at 11:24, Laura Vargas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Looks like we have 3 seats for 3 candidates :D 6 candidates, assuming the 3 people in those 3 seats want to stand for reeleection? Why would you assume this? ¯\_(?)_/¯ Why would you not? :D lol :) Because you announced elections will take place first week of December. If they were interested I'm sure they would already expressed interest as Ignacio, Samson and I. At least some interest in setting up the elections, don't you think? -- Laura V. I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org Happy Learning!
_______________________________________________ Lista olpc-Sur [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
