I don't think we need #7. But otherwise, +1 to EFI support On Nov 6, 2013 7:07 AM, "Nicolò Costanza" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi > > > About 1> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE > we have this disabled on i386, enabled in x86_64, that is unusual > > INFO: > http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/RELOCATABLE.html > > I'm worrying about > "The relocations tend to make the kernel binary about > 10% larger, but are discarded at runtime. > but "... discarded at runtime", maybe this should not harm kernel boot in > 32bit, is something getting my attention... > > > > About 6> OK > must we change CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS from "m" to "y" ? Really > need? > > > > About: 7> OK > I'll change from CONFIG_EFI_VARS=y to "n" > - now I'm waiting an answer if this is ok also for omv2013 (i think so) > > > > > bye, NicCo > > > Il Mercoledì 6 Novembre 2013 12:25, Nicolò Costanza <[email protected]> > ha scritto: > > Hi to all > > My answer to the interesting suggestions from Alexander Kazancev: > Alex Kazancev suggested us to verify and adopt the full archilunux configs > for the UEFI part > > Please, answer me ASAP as I have to prepare and send immediately > Kernels 3.10.18 & 3.11.7 with or without the proposed UEFI changes! > > > > Question and proposal > ========================================================= > Hi. Is our kernels has EFI-enabled config like this? > > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Linux_Kernel_Config_options_for_UEFI > > If not, may you enable this? > > -- > Alexander KazancevRelease manager of ROSA Desktop distribution > ========================================================= > > > > Answer > ========================= > nr. 8 keys to check: > ========================= > 1> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y > 2> CONFIG_EFI=y > 3> CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y > 4> CONFIG_FB_EFI=y > 5> CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y > 6> CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=y > 7> CONFIG_EFI_VARS=n > 8> CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y > ============================ > > > Our recent configs > ========================================================== > Kernel 3.10.17 & 3.11.6 have the same UEFI keys & values: > there are differences with ths suggestions from archilinux > we must verify if their suggestions are good also for us > ========================================================== > > 1> > ARM > none > 386 > # CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is not set > x64 > CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y > > 2> > ARM > none > 386 > CONFIG_EFI=y > x64 > CONFIG_EFI=y > > 3> > ARM > none > 386 > CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y > x64 > CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y > > 4> > ARM > none > 386 > CONFIG_FB_EFI=y > x64 > CONFIG_FB_EFI=y > > 5> > ARM > CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y > 386 > CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y > x64 > CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y > > 6> > ARM > none > 386 > CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=m > x64 > CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=m > > 7> > CONFIG_EFI_VARS=n, we have different configs, we have this "y", archilinux > say to put to "n" > if we dont support > old efivars sysfs interface - /sys/firmware/efi/vars, > this can be done > # > # EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) Support > # > CONFIG_EFI_VARS=y > CONFIG_EFI_VARS_PSTORE=y > CONFIG_EFI_VARS_PSTORE_DEFAULT_DISABLE=y > > 8> > ARM > CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y > 386 > CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y > x64 > CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y > > > > > Please, answer me ASAP as I have to prepare and send immediately > Kernels 3.10.18 & 3.11.7 with or without the proposed UEFI changes! > > bye, NicCo > > > _______________________________________________ > rosa-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rosalab.ru/mailman/listinfo/rosa-devel > > > > > > > >
