Before making the release announcement, we need to absolutely have the ISOs
on Sourceforge (at least) and our mirrors. Can Someone upload them on SF? I
don't have a very fast Internet connection, and there's only around 1 hr
left for release.

Thanks


On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]> wrote:

> So let's wait till 17 UTC
> Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:21:21
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bhandari, Anurag<[email protected]>; Cooker OpenMandriva<
> [email protected]>; <[email protected]>; Schönfelder,
> Jochen<[email protected]>; Xu, Robert<[email protected]>; Close, Colin<
> [email protected]>; Lebedeff, Kate<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] Odp.: Re: GO/No-GO RC2 candidate 15 Nov 2013
>
> Updated isos, in case someone wants to test:
>
>
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/53/product_build_lists/1951
>
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/54/product_build_lists/1950
>
> IMO we can just go ahead with the old ones though... But OTOH there
> really shouldn't be much of a difference.
>
> ttyl
> bero
>
> On 2013-11-15 12:14, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote:
> > Come on let's have fast decision on this.
> >
> > I'm for a tested ISO with one launcher that has won the contest rather
> > than a delay.
> >
> > Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange
> > -------------------------
> >
> > FROM: Anurag Bhandari <[email protected]>
> > DATE: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:38:37 +0530
> > TO: tpgxyz<[email protected]>; Cooker
> > OpenMandriva<[email protected]>
> > CC: OpenMandriva QA<[email protected]>
> > SUBJECT: Re: [OM Cooker] Odp.: Re: GO/No-GO RC2 candidate 15 Nov 2013
> >
> > I agree with TPG. It's wiser to go with a tested ISO (even though with
> > one launcher) than an untested one if we want the release to be done
> > today (an explanation about the launcher could be given in the
> > announcement). Or we could wait for a couple days more for Bero's new
> > ISOs to be tested and then do the RC2 release (an apology for delay
> > could be given in announcement).
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> We can not afford for a delay, because there should be two launchers
> >> anf finally there is one.
> >>
> >> RC2 release must be done today.
> >>
> >> Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Robert Xu <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Sender: [email protected]: Thu, 14 Nov 2013
> >> 23:31:43
> >> To: Cooker OpenMandriva<[email protected]>;
> >> OpenMandriva QA<[email protected]>
> >> Reply-To: Cooker OpenMandriva <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] GO/No-GO RC2 candidate 15 Nov 2013
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> If you haven't already noticed, the ISO we're asking to test only
> >> has
> >> one launcher. That was a mistake, and a new ISO should be in the
> >> pipes
> >> for both x86_64 and i586 (bero?) that fixes that.
> >>
> >> In the meantime, please disregard that criteria from your testing.
> >> Apologies.
> >>
> >> On 14 November 2013 08:51, Robert Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the delay and short time frame on this one. I must have
> >> your
> >>> responses for this by 17:00 UTC 15 Nov.
> >>>
> >>> As usual, by email please.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/53/product_build_lists/1917
> >> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> >
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/54/product_build_lists/1925
> >> [2]
> >>>
> >>> Robert
> >>
> >> --
> >> Robert Xu :: protocol.by/rxu [3]
> >
> > --
> >
> > May the Source be with you
> > anuragbhandari.com [4]
> >
> > Links:
> > ------
> > [1]
> >
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/53/product_build_lists/1917
> > [2]
> >
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/54/product_build_lists/1925
> > [3] http://protocol.by/rxu
> > [4] http://www.anuragbhandari.com
>



-- 
May the Source be with you
anuragbhandari.com <http://www.anuragbhandari.com>


Reply via email to