Hi
when there is the need to have it soon, it's better start a build with only one or two flavours enabled, for example -desktop, or -desktop & -laptop, and also launch the same rebuild twice... so the main flavours for the ISOs are ready, then in a second task can be launched the full rebuild with all the flavours we want to rebuild, with no fear if this need a full day rebuild in this way the files we need to have immediately would be ready and available in a couple of hours bye Il Domenica 17 Novembre 2013 15:48, Nicolò Costanza <[email protected]> ha scritto: I agree! Of course! You may ask to the QA guys for testing the 3.11.8 in their installed box... and report their feedback bye, NicCo Il Domenica 17 Novembre 2013 15:43, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]> ha scritto: Dnia niedziela, 17 listopada 2013 14:41:27 Nicolò Costanza pisze: > I've installed only in 5 different Pcs, and there works great, > but we can NOT be sure of anything with different Hardware... > > > You too can test it by adding the specific kernel 3.11 repo, and installing > it, and also all the QA team might test it... > > Sure will do. Anyways call to include this on GA is on Bero and Q&A - ofcourse if this won't delay release according to release plan. > > the repo is > > > x86_64 > > # urpmi.addmedia Kernel_3.11 > http://abf.rosalinux.ru/downloads/kernels_3_11x_personal/repository/rosa201 > 2.1/x86_64/main/release/ > > > i586 > > # urpmi.addmedia Kernel_3.11 > http://abf.rosalinux.ru/downloads/kernels_3_11x_personal/repository/rosa201 > 2.1/x86_64/main/release/ > > > > then, a simple command > > > # urpmi kernel-nrjQL-desktop-devel-latest kernel-nrjQL-desktop-latest > > > > > bye, NicCo > > > > > > Il Domenica 17 Novembre 2013 14:57, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > Dnia niedziela, 17 listopada 2013 11:37:34 Nicolò Costanza pisze: > > Hi > > > > > > > > from OM cooker ML, I have wrote > > > > http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker-openmandriva.org/2013-Novem > > be r/001936.html > > > > > > I repeat that: > > It's real pity that in omv2013 GA there will be not this 3.11.8 version... > > ;-)) Question: > > There is none chance to have kernel 3.11.8 for omv2013 GA? > > > > > > thanks for Your attention, and excuse me if I'm insisting too much... > > bye, NicCo > > Are we sure that 3.11.8 is quite stabe as 3.11.6 ? > > I think it is too late for 3.11.8 to get on GA.
