Ok. We have disabled generation of hdlist.cz in ABF repositories and
removed existing files. During the day, these changes should be picked
up by all mirrors. Please report us if you find any issues.
On 03/31/2014 02:23 PM, Tomasz Gajc wrote:
For me you can kill it with fire. Currently urpmi and friends do have
support for hdlist.cz <http://hdlist.cz> but as you have written it is
not used anymore for like 7 years.
2014-03-31 10:02 GMT+02:00 Denis Silakov <denis.sila...@rosalab.ru
<mailto:denis.sila...@rosalab.ru>>:
Hi all,
As many of you can likely notice, package publishing in ABF
usually takes relatively significant time - about several minutes
(sometimes up to 10 minutes).
One of the time-consuming tasks in the publishing is generation of
hdlist.cz <http://hdlist.cz> file - this is a huge file containing
internal urpm representation of metadata, including file lists,
package descriptions, etc. This file seems to be redundant -
nowadays we generate additional xml files (changelog.xml,
info.xml, etc.) which in combination with lightweight
synthesis.hdlist.cz <http://synthesis.hdlist.cz> provide the same
information. However, I am not so familiar with hdlist.cz
<http://hdlist.cz> and can't guarantee that nothing will be lost
if we completely drop it.
So the question is - can somebody say what will we lost (if any)
if we drop hdlist.cz <http://hdlist.cz> files? Or maybe we should
just try and see?
--
Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.
www.rosalab.ru <http://www.rosalab.ru>
--
Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.
www.rosalab.ru
