I think so, yesterday Bero said me that he updated the new srcs, then, this morning, TPG has updated the srcs, still old srcs,
better deleting the old file before importing the new srcs? Il Martedì 15 Aprile 2014 10:29, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]> ha scritto: Does abf pull request does not work, like it supposed to? Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange ________________________________ From: Nicolò Costanza <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:24:29 +0100 (BST) To: Tomasz Gajc<[email protected]>; Robert Xu<[email protected]>; Bernhard Rosenkränzer<[email protected]>; Colin Close<[email protected]> ReplyTo: Nicolò Costanza <[email protected]> Cc: Cooker OpenMandriva<[email protected]>; OpenMandriva QA<[email protected]> Subject: Re: 2014.0 RC1 Hi, - I may be wrong, but is better to check: it seems to me we are using ever the old rc1 srcs >>> https://abf.io/openmandriva/kernel/blob/master/.abf.yml - sources: "linux-3.13.10-rosa69.tar.xz": 0fea8b28c016615ea6b48021f33e910f8f2baead "linux-3.13.tar.xz": 6b31602a80e817327d77037333408e002ec9884b "patch-3.13.10.xz": c4a835685d6f5b48c1e33bf6cbfcb6e9f4cf448d - - these srcs are identical with the old 3.13.10-0 >>> https://abf.io/nicco/Kernel-3.13.10-0/blob/master/.abf.yml - sources: "linux-3.13.10-rosa69.tar.xz": 0fea8b28c016615ea6b48021f33e910f8f2baead "linux-3.13.tar.xz": 6b31602a80e817327d77037333408e002ec9884b "patch-3.13.10.xz": c4a835685d6f5b48c1e33bf6cbfcb6e9f4cf448d - while with the real, final and stable 3.13.10-1 I can see different numbers >>> https://abf.io/nicco/Kernel-3.13.10-1 - sources: "linux-3.13.10-rosa69.tar.xz": 616d080496155fbe0ffb67ba15e76a17058b9769 "linux-3.13.tar.xz": 6b31602a80e817327d77037333408e002ec9884b "patch-3.13.10.xz": e82cc13bf62065104347670002e7aa0ec00066d0 - Please, check this, and f I am right, imediately stop this wrong build! Perhaps is better, to delete the old srcs files, then import new srcs - - bye, NicCo Il Martedì 15 Aprile 2014 9:03, Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]> ha scritto: I have merged kernel 3.13.10-1 into 2014.0 and started builds: https://abf.io/build_lists/1792539 https://abf.io/build_lists/1792538 I may be, and prolly be afk whole day, but definietly will get back for a TC meeting. 2014-04-15 4:21 GMT+02:00 Robert Xu <[email protected]>: Hi Tomasz, > > >On 14 April 2014 18:54, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nicco what is the ETA on new kernel? >> >> Decision needs to be taken what to do, as QA needs few days on testing, and >> finally it would be highly unproffesional if we delay RC1 again. >> >> Current ISO build on Sunday, is missing default urpmi medias because of >> mirror issues. This is not a critical issue, but definietly won't give any >> good feedback on this (see bug #654). >> >> Colin, Robert - what QA voice on below options? >> >> 1. Wait till tommorow or perhaps plus one more day for new kernel and new >> ISO - less time for QA tests > >I personally can deal with this, but that's definitely not >representative of the whole of QA - especially since I only have one >piece of hardware... > >aside: it might be good to get more people into QA to test. > > >> >> 2. Rebuild ISO to solve bug 654 without waiting for new kernel - till >> tommorow - not so much time for QA tests > >is the new kernel building now? > > >> >> 3. Release Sunday's build with no medias (bug 654) as a RC1, gives more time >> for QA testing > >bug 654 might trip people up. I don't know how people will react to it. > > >> >> I'd like to have this discussed on tommorow's TC meeting, and work out a >> final decision. > >Sure. I'll try to attend, but if not, I delegate my voice to Colin. > >-- >cheers, Robert :: protocol.by/rxu >
