+1 for Paulo Need to fix cooker repos before 2015
2014-05-19 21:10 GMT+04:00 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]>: > I think we should fork cooker to 2015 branch as late as possible, because > we end up in maintaining two branches. > > Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > Sender: "OM-Cooker" <[email protected]>Date: Mon, 19 > May 2014 13:39:32 > To: Cooker OpenMandriva<[email protected]> > Reply-To: Cooker OpenMandriva <[email protected]> > Cc: OpenMandriva Infra<[email protected]>; OpenMandriva QA< > [email protected]>; OpenMandriva Workshop< > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] 2014-05-20 TC meeting > > Tomasz Gajc escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > i think it is time to start new development cycle. > > First we need to start plannin phase, so it means we should gather ideas > > which will be our feature list for upcoming next release. As we decided > on > > Prague meeting, release after 2014.0 will be based on cooker and will be > > breakthrough release with many spectacular features. > > My major concern is to strongly suggest to fix cooker first, then > fork for 2015.0 (should fork roughly 2 months before release), not > fork and then fix in the branch. There isn't so much activity in cooker, > and this could help we sort out some "packagers education" :-) to keep > cooker usable. > > > Plan for planning features phase: > > 1. Gather ideas on project.openmandriva.org till end of June > > 2. Debate on all ideas during TC meetings till end of June > > 3. Start implementation phase > > > > We need to be fast and cunning on this, because list of ideas is till > > growing up. Do not forget and if you have any ideas please fill them on > > project.openmandriva.org > > > > Agenda for TC meeting: > > > > 1. How to help newcomers join the fun ? > > a. Dedicated wiki page > > b. Video tutorials > > c. Other ideas ? > > > > 2. New ideas for next release > > 3. Debate on already registered ideas on project.openmandriva.org > > 4. Other issues ? > > > > Cheers > > TPG > > Thanks, > Paulo > > > >
