I think there should be some discussion about changing our bootloader. Just because systemd happens to support gummiboot does not necessarily imply that is will convey any advantages or indeed that we need to use it. Changing the bootloader was not in the original release plan in fact this is the first time it has ever been mentioned. I request there be a full discussion about this change with the relative advantages and disadvantages being examined in some detail. Best, Colin
Colin Close QA Team On Saturday 23 May 2015 22:51:53 Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: > Hi, > > as you may have noticed systemd 220 version has been released. > What is most important this version has merged gummiboot and now provides EFI > boot loader, which we should use in our next release as our default EFI > bootloader. > > Most importan changes are described here: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-May/032147.html > > Btw ibgudev is not a separate package. > > P.S. > > I've disabled uClibc build as it seems to not support O_PATH. > POK if you have time please take a look on this. > > /builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-220/src/shared/path-util.c: In function > 'fd_fdinfo_mnt_id': > /builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-220/src/shared/path-util.c:484:74: error: > 'O_PATH' undeclared (first use in this function) > subfd = openat(fd, filename, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_NOCTTY| > O_PATH); > > _______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
