Am 16.01.2016 um 22:53 schrieb Andreas Schneider:
Cecksum.......
forgotten.. another good way is it to generate on an "crypted System" a CRC, this is absolutely unique and trustful........

Regards



@BlackCrack
Stop it BlackCrack
never forget, i still keep all mails you and me have send.
Dont you remember i told you in our long conversations to have a look at Gentoo? The Mother of nearly all Linux OS? Why dont you still get it, that this simply was a helping hand and offer for help..... and you tell them what?
Listen, its better you ignore me and i do the same with you.

*lol* ah'  take to a occasion ...
you can make no difference to me... pffhh..
i refuse/decline a battle in the ML and that's not the point.
i piss on Gentoo (as clear opinion Statement ).. and if you want be aggressive,
be it, but not there ..

(Moderator, please stop that ! Thank you.)


by the way, why stay you not still on you loved Gentoo ?
if you want make there Trouble ?




2016-01-16 21:20 GMT+01:00 Blackcrack <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:



    Am 16.01.2016 um 16:38 schrieb Andreas Schneider:
    HI
    the old way of CRC Checksume is still a good thing, why to dont
    use it then? The Server or Build-Engine should generate the
    CRC,you just need to place them inside the Repro as usually. I am
    sure the old way how MDK/MDV used to do, can still be used.
    Regards
    in this one opinion..
    +1


    BTW, seems i got again blocked in the Mailinglist, if so i am
    out, could someone answer? or should i just see and wait if
    published. Isnt it weird? since BlackCrack and i had again ur
    "squarels" it starts again.....

    bubb ...
    want you try something again ? hehh ?
    if yes, then should you be blocked !
    and maybe banned..
    so, stay on topic and don't try any to insult !
    because this one i see as insult !

    Blackcrack .



    2016-01-15 14:31 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>:

        Hi,

        as we know after ABF breakdown, rpm packages signing are
        disabled in cooker - due to various problems. I'll check if
        this got magically fixed, but that is not a topic.

        Copule of weeks ago JBJ comes with an idea how to implement
        different trusinting mechanisms for rpm packages.

        Do we have a bluepronts for this anything more than idea ? It
        will have bad impact on release when comes to server to users
        errors about not verified rpm packages.

        Cheers.

        _______________________________________________
        OM-Cooker mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org




    _______________________________________________
    OM-Cooker mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org



    _______________________________________________
    OM-Cooker mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org




_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org


_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org

Reply via email to