We should set some kind of convention for naming .iso files so as to
avoid confusion about whether a specific build is/isn't Alpha, Beta, RC,
or GA. See these threads in fantastic new unified forum:
http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000072.html
https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/most-recent-development-iso-build-14378-this-isnt-the-beta-release/301
In this instance I replaced 'beta' in file names to 'dev-rel' short for
'development-release'. That's one way to do it. But perhaps it would be
even better to have build ID # in file name something like:
This is actually originally rugyada's idea. Quoting rugyada here:
Perhaps that could be done instead of 'dev-rel'?
I'd say
|OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel14378-PLASMA.x86_64.iso|
or for better reading
|OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel_14378-PLASMA.x86_64.iso|
I'd avoid whatever definition (alpha/beta/etc.) at all in development
releases file name.
People do know that are dev-rel and in which development stage we are
--
Ben Bullard
ben79
--------------------
OpenMandriva-QA Team
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
