Le 27 févr. 08 à 05:49, Michael Kohlhase a écrit :

Adding the whole would give us the opportunity to add useful metadata like licensing and authorship that Paul was asking for.

Someone needs to make an overview here. A quick-list at best, or a Trac page? Just to cope for full backwards compatibility two mappings (back and forth) should be described as well.
Christoph, are you candidate to that ?

Also, the question comes again as to the content-model of some of these elements (in particular description)... this will clearly be either DC-prescribed or non-interroperable with some. So I'd rather avoid any non-plain-text elements of the CDs to be DC-mapped.

As for extending the DC tagset for CDDefinition, CDExample,... and friends, I am all for it (whether we think of CDs as a unity or not). Authorship and Identifier and ... information are sensible for the parts as well.

Why is this "extending DC tagset" and not "just the CD format". At least I don't see this having place in the DC namespace, right ?

paul

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Om3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3

Reply via email to