On Tuesday 13 May 2008 12:53:15 Michael Kohlhase wrote: > Ah, I get the difference. Is this what you are trying to say? > > If we assume that in an ideal future we have cdbase-aware copy/paste, > then we are likely only to have it for the in-MOBJ case, not for the > CDSignatures --> MOBJ case.
Yes, and I think the justification was that every MOBJ should be self-contained, not requiring any contextual information from its enclosing CD, signature dictionary, whatever. Best, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, DERI Galway/Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Om3 mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3
